AAI Limited v Technology Swiss  FCAFC 168
This insurance case (at ) stresses that the meaning of a contract has nothing to do with subjective intentions of the parties. The High Court case quoted from, Byrnes v Kendall, makes parallel observations for statutes13. From every angle, interpretation in both spheres is to be objective.
With statutes, we are not looking for what parliament intended to say, but instead for what they objectively meant by the words they used14. This is a crucial aspect of our ‘modern approach’, on which Episode 66 about the Circle of Meaning provides more detail. Extrinsic materials which try to say what a provision means exert little weight in the process15.
This principle is from Episode 77 of interpretation NOW!
13 Byrnes v Kendall  HCA 26 (at ), Calidad  HCA 41 (at ).
14 Black-Clawson  AC 591 (at 613), Albert  NSWLEC 1401 (at ).
15 Harrison  NSWCA 67 (at ), Country  FCA 1636 (at [115-117]).