Ketjan v Assistant Minister [2019] FCA 516
Ketjan’s visa was cancelled under a migration provision requiring cancellation where someone has a substantial criminal record and is currently imprisoned. The decision-maker took into account a custodial sentence completed before the provision came into force. Was this prevented by the presumption against retrospective laws?13
The court held (at [40]) that the …
Cappello v RMS[2019] NSWSC 439
RMS could ‘acquire land for any of the purposes of this Act’. Affected owners resisted acquisition because the ‘objects’ clause in the Act did not extend to acquiring land for road tunnelling work. Campbell J (at [40-46]) rejected the argument on the basis that the ‘purposes of this Act’ are to be found in …
Treaties are traditionally interpreted in a more open way than domestic statutes. They are to be read in line with the international rules of construction1. Treaties enacted into domestic law are also interpreted against a different context compared to an ordinary statute2. Adoption of a treaty into domestic law also signals an objective intention by parliament …
Satyam Computer Services v FCT [2018] FCAFC 172
In this case, it was argued that double tax agreements can only ever be ‘shields not swords’. That is, DTAs can only limit domestic taxing rights, and cannot operate to grant extra taxing powers.
The court disagreed (at [28]), saying it was an error to approach construction of the Indian DTA from …
When reading overseas decisions, we should keep in mind their approach to interpretation. EU judges, for example, take a ‘teleological’ approach. This translates roughly as ‘purposive’, but not as we know it. Outcomes are driven more by economic policy and political factors than the text. Judges fill gaps in ways we see as activist in the extreme6. Ends …
Michos v Eastbrooke Medical [2019] VSC 131
Con Michos tried to exercise his statutory right to access a medical report about him10, but was required by the clinic first to see a doctor. After telling the clinic he had accessed the report another way, the clinic cancelled his appointment. Despite this, Michos continued to assert his right to …
Bhalsod v Perrie [2018] WASCA 108
The ‘always speaking’ concept arose in the 19th century as a style of drafting12, where present tense was used to cover future events in order to give effect to an Act’s ‘spirit, true intent and meaning’.
Now ‘always speaking’ is widely understood to allow statutory language to be ‘adaptable to new …
What do have in common? This is not the start of a bad joke. It is how you can be found to be acting in bad faith by using ‘greatly optimistic’ emojis in an abandoned transaction1. Since 2004, there has been an increasing number of cases2 where judges have had to interpret communications between parties using …
WHA v Outback Ballooning [2019] HCA 2
Did NT work safety laws ‘alter, impair or detract’ from federal provisions? In this context, Gageler J commented on the nature of legislative intention. It is what parliament is taken to intend the words to mean after the interpretation process is complete5.
The judge referred to ‘emergent scepticism’ about the very …
Kheir v Dept of Justice and Regulation [2019] VSC 76
Should provisions conferring ‘rights and privileges on a prisoner in return for good behaviour’ be read ‘liberally and beneficially towards the prisoner’? Prisoner rights are interpreted in line with the standard rules of construction – that is, having regard to purpose and context8.
Prisoner rights exist in a …
